|
 |
Knee-Muscle
Activation during Landings: Developmental and Gender Comparisons
Purpose:
This study determined anteroposterior knee-joint muscle activation differences
among children and adult males and females landing from a self-initiated
vertical jump (VJ) under normal and offset-target conditions to further understand
physical maturation`s influence on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)injury
risk. Methods: Fifty-five recreationally active volunteer
subjects grouped by age (children = 9.5 T 0.9 yr; adult = 23.9 T 2.8 yr)
and gender (females = 28; males = 27) completed motion analysis, ground reaction
force, and surface electromyography (SEMG) data collection during a two-footed
landing under straight (midline-target) and offset-target (adult = 45.7 cm;
child = 30.5 cm) conditions. Target height was 50% of maximum VJ height.
Co-contraction ratios (CCR) (hamstrings (HAMS)/vastus medialis (VM) activity)
from normalized SEMG root mean squares were analyzed in the prelanding (PRE)
(100 ms before initial contact (IC)), reflexive (REF) (100 ms after IC),
and voluntary (VOL) (end of REF to maximum knee flexion) muscle activity
phases. Repeated-measures statistical analyses determined significant gender,
physical maturation, and target differences (P G 0.05) in CCR and associated
HAMS and VM activity across landing phases. Results: A significant
interaction (P G 0.0001) indicated similar CCR for children and adults during
the REF and VOL phases, but during the PRE phase adult CCR (619.04 + 52.01)
were two times greater than children`s (308.32 T 51.04). Significantly
more HAMS activity, not less VM activity, increased adult PRE-CCR. Gender
and target CCR differences were absent. Conclusions:
Children`s decreased preparatory cocontraction about the knee does not seem
to be linked to increased ACL injury risk. Thus, adults may strive
for preparatory cocontraction levels about the knee that permit adaptability
to varied landing tasks.
2007,
Russell PJ, Croce RV, Swartz EE, Decoster LC: Knee-Muscle Activation during
Landings: Developmental and Gender Comparisons. Med Sci Sprt
Ex, Vol 39:1, 159-169.
|  |
|